Since I often refer to the famous quote, “the road to Hell is paved with good intentions” I was intrigued by an article in today’s Wall Street Journal entitled, “When Good Deeds Turn Bad” by Jefffery Zaslow. (Don’t ask my why the WSJ titles it one way in the paper edition and then titles it - “Doing Bad by Doing Good” - in the online edition. Also, don’t ask me why the search function on their website is so awful - that’s a topic for another post!) Anyway…

The article is a good one for anyone involved in service design. Zaslow points out a number of examples of people with good intentions, but bad results. While many of the examples are from the world of charity, the lessons directly apply to business and the design of services. From the article:

‘Most of us want to be effective, he says, “to make the world better. But before you help people, you have to ask them, ‘What do you need? What do you want?’” Every day, we see reminders of the limitations, and even the dangers, of good intentions. In Haiti, U.S. missionaries who said they only wanted to save orphaned children ended up arrested on child-trafficking charges. In Asian countries hit by the 2004 tsunami, residents still shake their heads over the warehouses filled with unusable donations, including winter coats and stiletto shoes. And earthquake-ravaged Chile is sure to receive its share of “useless aid” in the days ahead.

And from another section:

Ms. Hogan tells of going to a village in Peru where an aid group brought in tourists to help build public toilets. The group ran out of money and time, the tourists ended their volunteering vacations, and the toilets were never completed. The aid group had thought access to restroom facilities was needed to boost living standards, Ms. Hogan says. “But when I asked people in the community what they wanted, they said, ‘What we really needed was irrigation, and to have our bridge fixed, so we could take our goods to market.’” The never-completed toilets were gaping holes that had to be covered. Villagers feared their children would fall in.

We see these types of well-intentioned efforts all the time among businesses. At best, the companies really do (mistakenly) believe that they are working in the best interest of their customers. At the worst, the companies actually seem to have a sub-conscious contempt (see our previous post) for their customers and the very people who will be using the service. Either way, it comes down to a simple (almost too simple?) bottomline: JUST ASK.

This is what we do for our service design clients via ethnographic research; we go out and talk with their customers (internal or external) and have conversations. We observe, engage and ask questions. Then we compile those findings and bring them back to reveal what people want. This works for everything from service design, to volunteering, to parenting and spousal relationships.  It’s absolutely amazing what you can learn when you put aside what you think is right, and just ask.

In our service design practice, we triangulate the trends of business, technology and society to predict for our clients where things might be in one, three or five years. (Okay, five years is a very long time.) So we’re always gratified when those predictions come true and here’s one we’ve been talking about for years: car monitoring to reduce insurance rates.

In effect, would you make a deal with your car insurance company that you promise not to go over the speed limit, in exchange for a 10% decrease? How about 15 or 20%? In order to prove that, would you be willing to let the insurance company install a small device on your vehicle that tracked your speed? Maybe you get one or two chances, but then the third time you speed - bing - you lose the discount.

Well, that future is here. Progressive Insurance has announced the My Rate Program, which provides a small device that plugs into your car’s on board computer. The device tracks things like when and how you drive your car including acceleration, hard braking, etc. and then sends that data back to Progressive wirelessly. (The system is not based on GPS, so it’s not tracking where you go but still, we can imagine that in a future generation.)

Let’s take this one step further: How about a deal where you promise your life insurance company not to text or talk on the phone while driving, in exchange for a very big discount? After all, that behavior has shown to increase the likelihood of accidents by a factor of four. After an accident, it would be a simple matter for the insurance company to compare the time of airbag deployment with your cell phone bill to determine if you kept your promise. If not, no health care for you or no death benefits for your loved ones. Would you take that deal?

There is a saying that “everything in life is a trade-off,” and with advances in technology these types of automated trade-offs will start to permeate our relationships with service providers and impact pricing options. Watch for these trends in everything from insurance to mortgages to TV and shopping. It’s one thing to have privacy taken away from you, but it’s quite another thing to trade it for cash. So what’s your “break-point,” at which you would give up details of your private life in exchange for a discount? 10%, 30%, 80%? Everything’s negotiable.

Should companies protect consumers from themselves? That’s the question raised in the recent case of the teenager in California who, once added to his Dad’s Verizon Wireless account, ran up a bill of $22,000 by downloading over 1.4 gigabytes of data on his cell phone. Dad did not have a data plan, so…. as the meter ran (and ran and ran) Verizon was charging Dad by the byte.

In this particular case, Verizon agreed to waive the fee after the story got a ton of press. But typically, on an “oops I made a mistake” case like this, Verizon will split the charge with the customer. (So, Dad would still be on the hook for $11,000!)

The website The Consumerist raises the question: why not create a fail-safe system that would alert a customer if there was an unusual spike in their usage? Credit card companies have done this for years, mostly related to preventing fraud. But is it the job of a corporation to prevent customers from spending too much money on their goods or services? How about sellers of luxury goods or automobiles or casinos? Should companies become their “brother’s keeper?”

Actually, we would suggest a middle ground. When signing up new customers, Verizon should provide the account owner with the option of being notified in case of a spike in usage or fees. They could even offer levels of 100, 200 or 500 percent over normal. These are (or should be) simple variables that can be plugged into their management systems that in turn, would add a great deal of value to customers, if they chose to participate.

(And no, Verizon - you shouldn’t charge for the alert service. Use it as a point of differentiation!)

We have a saying that we share with our clients when talking about service design: “Add value and money will follow.”

What this means is that you should look at your business - your expertise - and find small, inexpensive ways to leverage that expertise for the benefit of either your existing customers,or prospective customers. Often, the net effect is huge.

Why? Because, supposedly, you are the expert in whatever you do. And consumers these days don’t have time to be experts in all things. So they are looking for what we call “editorial filters,” the companies or individuals who know something they don’t, that can point them in the right direction, make their lives easier, safer, richer, more convenient, etc. These are the “trusted advisors” in our lives. You would think that the those vendors who make the most money from us (think lifetime value) would be most incented to actually be a trusted advisor, and not just a provider of a commodity service. (Think bankers, lawyers, insurance companies, mortgage companies, auto dealers, airlines, etc.)

So imagine my dismay the other day when Allstate Insurance - who I have been with for over 20 years and in that time have probably given them over $35,000 of my hard earned cash - sent me a “Happy Birthday” email. Really? A birthday email? Does someone at Allstate marketing really consider this a best practice of “customer relationship management?” Come on folks. This is 2009!

There a plenty of ways for Allstate to add value to our relationship beyond paying a claim I might submit on average, once per decade. How about using that same email to direct me to that online video about the horrors of texting and driving that I could then send to my teenage daughter? (You know I have teenage daughter - she’s on the policy!) Or how about links to defensive driving classes and offering me a 5% discount for taking it? Maybe you could send me the annual list of the top 10 safest cars, as rated by an independent agency? Tips on how to make my car last longer? Anything… except a gratuitous birthday email!

And these are ideas I am coming up with off the top of my head. This is YOUR business - cars, safety, driving, technology, best practices, statistics, data. You have thousands of employees and massive investments in collecting and analyzing all this information. So why don’t you share a bit of it with me - your customer - to make me a better driver, a safer driver - and ultimately a better customer for YOU?

But you better hurry, because statistically speaking I only have about 40 more years of driving (and insurance payments) left!

Need some help figuring this out? Call us - you’ll be in good hands…

We just added four new PDF case studies to our website, which can be found on our client list page. These include case studies about:

- ColorQuick, a software company developing game-changing technology in the printing industry. Our ethnographic research turned up new and compelling benefits for their target market.

- BlackGold BioFuels, an energy technology company that has a patented system for converting waste products into high quality bio-diesel fuel. We helped them design new services that support the technology product, as well as innovative new business models for rolling out their products and services.

- A major hotel chain and our work with them on designing new service revenue opportunities related to rapid developments in the Connected-TV space.

- A major luxury retailer and a series of card sort exercises we did for them related to a new product design initiative.

Also, after a number of requests from our business partners, we created a one-page executive summary about Frontier Service Design that can be downloaded here.

Read, learn and enjoy!

Every once in a while we take the Frontier team out on a field trip to experience new services and to think about service design. This week, we took a trip to Wegmans the legendary grocery store chain, that is expanding along the east coast of the United States.

This most recent store opened in a Philadelphia suburb called Collegeville, a few weeks ago. Prior to the door’s opening the first day, there were over 1,500 customers lined up outside. Keep in mind, they weren’t giving away anything for free - they were just opening for business!

Here is link to some photos we took that day inside the store. Beyond the selection and prices, Wegmans does a fantastic job creating a very comfortable and inviting shopping environment, while also staffing the store with outstanding people. (They hired 550 out of over 6,000 applicants.) They also pushed the state of Pennsylvania on the definition of what a grocery store could be, and ended up being able to sell six packs of beer. (For those of you who live outside of Pennsylvania, this is a big deal!)

Here is a round-up of innovative uses of vending machines from around the world, compiled by Trendwatching.com. These are all great examples of service design. How, you ask, since they are all selling products? Service design comes into play in the methods in which they have chosen to “get” products to customers. That delivery is, in and of itself, a service supporting the product. In most cases this is about delivering the product to the right customers in the right place at the right time. And in doing so, cutting out a whole chain of middlemen, resellers, and wholesalers. (Is that good or bad? Depends on what role you currently play in that chain!)

This is also another example of technology prices continuing to fall, which make it financially feasible to distribute via vending machines or self-service kiosks. That technology is applied to not only the “machine” itself, but also it’s wired or wireless connection back to headquarters to let it’s owners know when it’s time to restock or fix the machine.  Which of these would you use?

• Barcelona company Lof (short for ‘Lo Fresco’) has developed a range of vending machines that only dispense healthy food, from prepared fruit and ready meals to gazpacho soup.
• Redbox specializes in the vending of DVDs via self-service kiosks. Redbox kiosks are located throughout the US in fast food restaurants, pharmacies, grocery stores and convenience stores, leasing out DVDs from USD 1 per night.
• Launched earlier this year, US based U*tique bills itself as the world’s first interactive, automated luxury store for “life’s little emergencies and indulgences”. Debuting at Los Angeles retailer Fred Segal, U*tique lets consumers learn about selected luxury and personal-care products and have them dispensed with a swipe of their credit card. Only 50 products are available at any given time, and all have been handpicked by product specialists with backgrounds in global beauty, trend-hunting and innovation. The technology features a touch-screen interface, interactive LED lighting design, and a behind-the-scenes robot that delivers products from secure storage into consumers’ hands.
• German farm ‘Peter-und-Paul-Hof’ has begun selling its fresh produce in vending machines. The specially designed Regiomat machines sell milk, eggs, butter, cheese, potatoes and sausage in thirteen German towns and communities.
• The Standard Hotel chain in the US has introduced a retail concept by placing vending machines stocked with designer swimming trunks in their hotels. Quiksilver and André Balazs’ have partnered to fill the vending machines in the New York, Los Angeles, Hollywood and Miami hotels.
• Bike manufacturer Trek set up a prototype Trek Stop Cycling Convenience Center in Madison, Wisconsin. Located outside (and operated by) bike shop Machinery Row, the Trek Stop is a convenience center for cyclists. The vending machine is stocked with bicycle products such as spare tubes, patches, tire levers and more, along with food and cold drinks.
• InstyMeds have developed vending machines to dispense medication. The machines are designed to be placed in doctors’ offices, clinics, emergency rooms and other healthcare facilities. Each holds 100 of some of the most often used medications, ranging from pills to drops to creams and so forth.
• Last year, US Electronics retailer Best Buy installed vending machines at 14 major US airports as part of a successful pilot program for the company’s new Best Buy express kiosks. The kiosks are large vending machines that carry cell phone and computer accessories, flash drives, MP3 players, headphones, gaming devices, travel adapters, and other items that are likely to appeal to customers on the go.
• Kosher Vending Industries in the US operates “Hot Nosh” vending machines that deliver hot kosher meals in 90 seconds. The company originally launched with more than 50 locations in New York City and has expanded nationwide through partnering agreements and regional licensing.

And we particularly like this one, which solves a very specific problem, in very specific places…

• Two British companies now sell their version of portable ballet flats in vending machines at nightclubs: Rollasoles sell for about GBP 5 and come in four colors: Hi Ho Silver, Gold Digger, Back to Black and Pink. Afterheels are similar rollable ballet flats which have the added feature of being recyclable.

Today’s Wall Street Journal has an article entitled, “Palm’s Pre Smart Phone Fails to Stem Deep Losses.” The article goes on to describe the Palm’s quarterly loss has quadrupled since the launch of the much-touted Pre on June 6. Revenues are down, profits are down.

But how much of this is attributed to the phone itself, which has been lauded as an “iPhone killer,” versus the partner that Palm chose to dance with on the network provider side? This is a classic case service design example of the symbiotic relationship between products and services. From our vantage point, Palm’s problem is not the Pre product, but the Sprint Nextel network, which is suffering from massive customer flight due to spotty coverage, dropped calls and bad customer service.

As a long-time (and happy) Verizon customer, I have been jonesing for the Palm Pre ever since I saw it in Las Vegas last January at the Consumer Electronics Show. Add into the mix that I am also a long-time (and happy) Palm Inc, customer who started on the old Palm Pilot handheld organizer, moved up into the Treo family of smartphones and is now happily using a Palm Centro. And even though I’m happy I STILL want a Pre. But I will not buy it until Verizon has it. (This is probably also the number one reason I don’t have an iPhone - even though I am Mac everywhere else in my life - you can only get an iPhone via AT&T, another inferior network to Verizon.)

Call me old fashioned, or just call me loyal. But Verizon has always done right be me when it comes to mobile communications and that service relationship is the stake in the ground around which my product decisions are made. This is a key insight of service design that product folks often don’t get: it’s more about the service “eco-system” than it is about individual features of a product.

When is this insanity going to stop? Imagine if you bought a Chevrolet and you could only put Sunoco gas into it. In Europe, the phone networks are independent of the handsets so that consumers are free to combine their favorites. Until the U.S. adopts the same model,  I just have to hope that Palm hangs in there long enough for me to get a Pre on the Verizon network. Please, Santa…

A critical part of the service design process is putting into place feedback loops which enable your customer to let you know how you’re doing. This is a delicate matter because you want to do it without disrupting the customer experience. That’s why we applaud Facebook and the way they’ve incorporated a simple feedback loop into their advertising.

Did you ever notice the little “x” at the top corner of a Facebook ad? I kept seeing these annoying ads for “Mafia Wars,” a Facebook game that appears to be wildly popular with others. Out of curiosity I clicked on the “x” up in the corner of the ad, having been conditioned over the years to know that clicking on an “x” makes things go away. That feature is standard user interface component for applications, or a way to get rid of an intrusive “overlay” ad that hides content below it.

In this case, the ad on Facebook was on the side of the page just sitting there. And being able to hit the “x” to just make it go away is a great idea. But before the ad goes away, Facebook solicits your feedback by asking “Why don’t you want to see this ad?” Your options are misleading, offensive, uninteresting, irrelevant, repetitive or other (in which case a text box pops up for your custom input.)

After making a selection, you see “Thanks for your feedback. Over time, this information helps us deliver more relevant ads to our users.”

There’s also the famous “thumbs up” logo at the bottom of the ad to show that you like the ad. (It would be interesting to see a breakdown of how many people click the “thumbs up” versus the “x” - and why.)

This is such a simple, yet powerful tool. Why don’t other websites integrate this feedback feature into their online advertising? The whole point of the web is that is interactive. “Ask and ye shall receive,” right? We all know that ads are the currency of the realm when it comes to delivering content. So why not do everything you can to get feedback from viewers as to what they like or don’t like, and why?

Smart move Facebook, and a great example of a powerful feedback loop for service design!

Starbucks is taking a page from Toyota’s playbook in their new focus on streamlining the coffee-brewing process. From bending over to scoop coffee from below the counter, to eliminating idle moments waiting for expired coffee to drain, an 11-person team is bringing the gospel of “lean manufacturing” to more than 11,000 Starbucks stores.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Starbucks says the efforts are already helping its bottom line, as shown by quarterly results last month that beat analysts’ expectations. However, there are some employees who fear that the new efforts will turn them into coffee-making robots.

This focus on streamlined operations is an interesting complement to the other tack that Starbucks is taking with some of its stores in “de-Starbucking” them. Stores across the country are being revamped to look like locally-owned coffeehouses, complete with local artwork, baked goods and live music. The stores go by the name of their street address i.e. “250 Chestnut” and have drawn mixed reviews from observers. While some accuse Starbucks of going “stealth” in trying to pretend to be a local small business, customers who have actually experienced the stores give them high marks for being much more community-oriented, fun and funky than their corporate brethren.

Turning a ship the size of Starbucks is a slow and daunting task, but we give management credit for both their initiative and imagination. This is a great example of service design in which they’re using both sides of their brains; focusing on both mechanics and aesthetics, to improve both the bottom-line and the customer experience. How can you do the same in your business?